AWS Neptune vs FalkorDB
The best AWS Neptune Alternative
Ready to leave behind ballooning costs, poor latency and inadequate performance?
| Licensing | ||
|---|---|---|
| FalkorDB | Neptune | |
| Open Source |
✓
|
✗
|
| Architecture | ||
|---|---|---|
| FalkorDB | Neptune | |
| Data Storage | In-memory | On disk |
| Written in | C, Rust | Java / C++ |
| Enterprise Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| FalkorDB | Neptune | |
| Multi-tenancy |
✓
All plans
|
X
|
| Replication |
✓
|
✓
|
| Performance | ||
|---|---|---|
| FalkorDB | Neptune | |
| Latency | Ultra-low | Poor |
| Memory Efficiency | Highly efficient | Poor |
| Horizontal Scaling | Flexible |
X
|
| Query & Processing | ||
|---|---|---|
| FalkorDB | Neptune | |
| Query language | Cypher | Gremlin, Cypher (limited) |
| Query execution Plans |
✓
|
✓
|
| Vector & Full-text Search |
✓
|
X
|
| Deployment Options | ||
|---|---|---|
| FalkorDB | Neptune | |
| On-prem |
✓
|
X
|
| Cloud |
✓
|
✓
|
Licensing
Open Source
FalkorDB
✓
AWS Neptune
✗
Architecture
Data Storage
FalkorDB
In-memory
Neptune
On disk
Written in
FalkorDB
C, Rust
Neptune
Java / C++
Enterprise Features
Multi-tenancy
FalkorDB
✓
All plans
Neptune
X
Replication
FalkorDB
✓
Neptune
✓
Performance
Latency
FalkorDB
Ultra-low
Neptune
Poor
Memory Efficiency
FalkorDB
Highly efficient
Neptune
Poor
Horizontal Scaling
FalkorDB
Flexible
Neptune
X
Query & Processing
Query language
FalkorDB
Cypher
Neptune
Gremlin, Cypher (limited)
Query execution Plans
FalkorDB
✓
Neptune
✓
Vector & Full-text Search
FalkorDB
✓
Neptune
X
Deployment Options
On-prem
FalkorDB
✓
Neptune
X
Cloud
FalkorDB
✓
Neptune
✓
Stop 'deCyphering' Which
Graph Database is Better.
"FalkorDB has been a game-changer for our startup. Disappointed by Neo4j's lack of support and slow performance, we turned to FalkorDB as a robust backend solution. Our wish? To run non-traversal queries with performance rivaling MongoDB or Postgres—something FalkorDB delivers where Neo4j fell short." - Anthony Ray, 2Arrows CTO.
★
★
★
★
★
4.3/5 on